Sound – Shabda

Its Nature and Application in Yoga

 

Dr. Parimal Devnath,

12B174-Valvan,

Lonavla, Pune, (India).

 

Introduction

 

Sound is of two types:

A.  one, that is generated by friction of two or more objects (aahata), like striking of a bell.  This variety of sound is physical and is a means of communication.  It again is of two kinds. 

i.  One, that is non-word, for example, ringing of a bell or roaring of thunder.  This variety of sound is mostly indicative and is not as sophisticated a medium of communication as spoken word. 

 

ii.  Second variety is word.  Word is used by human beings through articulation of vocal cords, tongue and lips in association with breath.  After pronunciation, it is heard by ears.  It is highly powerful and widely used means of communication. An uttered word has the capability to build as well as to destroy.  Realizing this, Patanjali in his Mahabhashya stated that ‘a word well studied and properly used can even lead one to spiritual freedom’. 

All words are sounds (except those occur in mind forming a thought).  But all sounds are not words.

 

B.  Second variety of sound is non-physical since it is not generated by friction of objects, nor is it produced by vocal cords of a human.  This variety is called anaahata.  It is discussed only in Yoga and other allied spiritual systems.

As described in Hathapradipika, anaahata can be heard as sounds resembling those of thunder, flute, bell etc.  Realm of anaahata-naada is quite unintelligible, unknown, mysterious and also mystical.  It indicates existence of a non-physical, non-phenomenal world underneath, coming in contact with it bears deep implication on mind, conscience, buddhi, consciousness etc.  It is heard during upward spiritual journey of an aspirant as he transcends certain mundane and mental layers.  It is said to be heard only through the right ear (even though the ear is kept closed) during upward movement of Kundalini Shakti.

It is through sound and shabda alone that one can realize existence of a thing or event of past, present and future, things which are formless (for example, feeling of devotion, knowledge and ecstasy, various sentiments, emotions etc.) and also imaginary and non-real objects (such as wish-fulfilling tree, castle in the air etc.).    

 

We wish to limit our present discussion only to certain basic aspects of word, its position and use in Yoga.    

 

 

Genesis of (word) shabda

Shabda (word as sound) is all-pervading and all-permeating.  There is no corner in the universe which is not covered by sound or word.  This has been realized by the sages of the ancient times.  On due deliberation, they have concluded that word itself is Brahma.  Shabda is as Eternal and Absolute as Brahma is.  Such an understanding has prompted them to frame the theory of ‘Shabda-brahma’ (Brihadaranyakopanishad-4.1). Brahma the Absolute and Supreme Consciousness is conceived as shabda. It is also said that shabda has originated from Pure Consciousness itself. 

On the same line, there exists another theory of ‘Shabdaadvaita’ – monistic interpretation of the theory of sphota advocated by Bhartrihari (a very wise king and highly gifted and learned grammarian).  This is how shabda as a universal phenomenon has been viewed.  Shabda is one of the five tanmaatras (sources of five basic elements), as per Saamkhya, from which aakaasha (ether) has been evolved.  Since aakaasha is all-pervasive, shabda as its source or origin occupies a much higher and superior status.  In traditional culture, shabda is accorded an elevated and highly respectful position of a Goddess giving it a religio-spiritual overtone.  It is called as Vaag-devi or Sarasvati in the Vedas.  

Shabda is just like shinning light.  It illuminates all objects, events, knowledge and wisdom in a human.  Therefore, the Sanskrita poet Dandi has rightly said, ‘has there been no shabda spreading effulgence, the whole universe would have been engulfed by darkness’.     

 

How is shabda generated ?  Panini in his Shikshaa says,

“It is aatman which in co-ordination with buddhi decides a subject on which it would like to express.  It engages the mind to speak.  Mind stimulates the bodily fire which subsequently inspires praana.  Thereafter, praana moves slowly through the chest.  Thus a sound is produced.’’

 

Shabda-shaastra – ‘study of shabda’  is the study of relationship of shabda with an object which it indicates, its genesis, expansion, usage etc. It also studies the nature of dhvani (alphabets, letters), rupa (derivation), artha (meaning), vaakya (sentence) and vyutpatti (derivation, etymology).  Various aspects of shabda have been deeply studied in ancient India. An elaborate analysis regarding fundamentals of shabda is found in Mahaabhaashya of Patanjali and in Vaakyapadiya of Bhartrihari.  Nyaaya and Mimamsaa also have discussed some of the salient issues regarding shabda.  

 

Components and evolutes of shabda

‘Aakaasha has been evolved from shabda’— it has been said in the system of Saamkhya.  In this system of classical philosophy and also in some of the Upanishads, shabda is one of the five tanmaatras which are evolutes of the Primal Prakriti which is at the very cause of the manifested creation. 

From shabda, a sentence is formed which gives  a meaningful expression.

Shabda has dhvani or letters or alphabets as components.  Alphabets are also called as akshara meaning indestructible which are smallest units of shabda.    

Since shabda as sound has the quality of aakaasha (ether), it can be perceived by hearing organ, since this organ is the seat of space.

           

Language is one widely used medium of communication. A language has factor in word or shabda. 

A number of dhvanis or letters come together to make a word or shabda which carries the potentiality to express a meaning. It forms the cause for all oral communication. It is related to mind and buddhi.   It occupies the space of mind and intellect.

Bhartrihari in his Vakyapadiya-I.46-47 says,

“Just as light or fire remains hidden in firewood, similarly, shabda remains embedded in buddhi, which determines its correct usage through an organ.”

It is also to be noted that even though it appears that shabda and its artha (meaning or an object) conveyed by a particular shabda are two different things, in fact these two are inseparably interrelated. Had it not been so, any shabda would have conveyed any meaning. Potency (shakti or sphota) of shabda is its natural companion or dharma just as heat is the dharma (nature) of fire.

Patanjali in his Mahabhyasha on Panini’s Sutras says— ‘Siddhe shabdaartha-sambhandhe’— the relationship of a shabda with its corresponding object is eternal. 

 

Sphota

The grammarians are of the opinion that a particular ‘meaning’ is conveyed by using a ‘word’. It happens due to sphota (lit. explosion) or vaak-tatva (its potentiality) which is eternal (even though the sound of a word is short-lived) and its relationship with object it indicates. A dhvani or a letters (varna) only gives an expression to sphota which is absolute in nature. Therefore, sphota and shabda are one and the same.  

This contention is not subscribed by the schools of Mimaamsaa and Nyaya.

 

            Is shabda eternal (nitya) or impermanent (anitya)? Yaaska the author of Nirukta is of the opinion that shabda is eternal (nitya). 

            At the worldly plane all dealings of shabda is done and received through senses alone. In the process of production and hearing, shabda is continuously being produced and destroyed – this is an opinion of some scholars. Countering this, Yaaska says, even though position of shabda is always in a state of flux, “relationship of shabda and artha (object or meaning) is permanently embedded in the mind of the vaktaa (speaker) and shrotaa (audience).  Therefore, shabda is eternally existent.” 

Sphota is the capacity (shakti) i.e. shabda-shakti which is manifested through letters and words conveying a meaning. Sphota generally means explosion i.e. uccaarana (pronunciation) of an expression in the form of words, letters and sentences. It is the essence of words etc. Sphota lends right cognition to a word or sentence. This essence of sphota has metaphysical implication and is eternal in nature as has been delineated in ancient philosophical school in the way of Shabda-brahma doctrine.        

           

Shabda is illusive

Amrita-bindupanishad-15 says that the word (shabda) that we use in our daily life is not ultimately real.  It serves us only in our real life.  Therefore, it is called maayaa or illusion, having no true substance.  Shabda is only vyavahaarika (worldly) truth and not paaramaarthika (Absolute) and therefore shabda is illusory.

 

Shabda and mind in Yoga

            Savitarka, Savicaara, Nirvirtaka, Nirvicaara- these terminologies are used by Patanjali in his Yogasutra.  Each of these describes the state of mind on the measure and intensity and also content of words which invariably occupy the space of mind.  Thus by judging by this yardstick, the status and degree of progress of a practising Yogi can be traced properly.  These terms are quite self-explanatory.

            Vitarka (PYS-I.17)— a mind busy in analysis of gross object.  So is Savitarka (PYS-I42).

            Vicara (PYS-I.17)— a mind preoccupied with analysis of subtle object.  So also is savicara (PYS-I.44).

            Nirvitarka (PYS-I.43) and nirvicara (PYS-I.44,47) are states of the mind which is free from all activities – gross or subtle.

            It can be said that words (shabda) play a very definitive and decisive role in shaping up a mind.  It is more so in the path of Yoga.  Yoga has plans for the mind depending upon one’s objective.  One can even render the mind free from all words by making use of or repeating suggested words, which is a process of replacing the ordinary words in mind and finally freeing it completely.

           

This process involves mainly two different sets of words and sounds— one repetition of  bija-mantras and the other access to anahata-nada.

 

Sound in Hatha practice

Varieties of shabda (sound) have been recommended in Hatha tradition of Yoga.  All these practices are aimed at rendering the mind, first of all, from habitual distractions and fickleness and then taking it altogether to the transcendental state.  This is done through gradual development of one-pointedness.  For this engaging the mind only on single, decided and dedicated object in the form of sound is said to be of great importance.   

This tradition suggests at least two varieties of sounds for this purpose.  One is various bija mantras (which are aahata sounds) and the other is absorbing the mind in  anaahata variety of sound.

Vyasa Bhashya-I.35 (on YogaSutra) says that perception of supernatural sound is called shabda-samvit.  It is suggested that one should concentrate mind at the root of the tongue.  Thus consciousness of the supernatural sound arises.  This stabilizes a mind which is fickle.

           

Hathapradipika-I.43 and Gheranda Samhitaa-I.32 suggest practice of bhraamari-kumbhaka which provides access to anaahata-naada.  According to Gheranda Samhitaa it is naadaabhivyakti or naadaanusandhaana.

            Nadanusandhana is helpful in entering the state of Samaadhi.  Yogashikhopanishad says that vaasanas are made ineffective due to practice of nadanusandhana.  Thus naadaanusandhaana should imply citta-vritti-nirodha.  Upanishadbrahmayogi is of the opinion that naada can be heard as a result of repetition of so’ham.

 

a)       Practice of Aahata

i. Pranava as bija

Hatha tradition says that the entire universe is nothing but an expression of pranava.  It is the bija of all bija-mantras.  Pranava is expressed by the sound OM which is comprised of three syllables— a, u and m which represent creation, sustenance and dissolution respectively.  Creation evolves out of Pranava and also finally rests in it.

Vyaasa Bhashya of Patanjala Yogasutra-I.28 quotes Garuda-puraana explaining  three syllables of Pranava–

‘A’ represents Vyaktra – the manifest creation, ‘u’ the un-manifest or avyaakrita and ‘m’ the Purusha – Supreme Consciousness. 

In other words, secrete of creation is contained in Pranava repetition of which is helpful in unraveling this secret.

Gheranda Samhita says that Pranava is the sacred monosyllabic mantra which should be repeated in sthula-dhyaana (during basic meditation).

 

A-U-M = Akaara of OM moves the Hrit-padma, Ukaara opens it up and makaara brings the naada (centrally aroused sensation of sound).  The last half-syllable Ardhamaatraa is said to be Nishcala (unmoving).  Perhaps the idea is that in the end there are no vibrations of the vocal organ (Yoga-tatvopanishad).  

Pranava – Taaraka (Vasishtha Samhitaa-vi.5) says Taaraka means Brahma (Mandala-brahmanopanishad-1(II)4; Advaya-tarakopanishad-3,8) knowledge of which helps in crossing the ocean of samsaara – (Samsara-saagara-santaranaat).

 

ii. Hatha has suggested a set of bija-mantras to get to the core of the process of creation.  One such practice involves repetition of bija-mantras such as hrim, vam, etc.  The word bija means seed.  Just as a seed contains the potentiality of a large tree, similarly, a bija (mantra holds key to the very mystry of the universe.  This is done by neutralizing the mind (sunya).  For example, the practice of khecari is supposed to take one to the state of sunya or absolute void, signified by the word ‘kha’ meaning vacuum.  A secret khecari-mantra has been revealed in Yogakundalyupanishad with this objective kept in mind.  Hatha is of  opinion that only by making the mind free from all objects, true nature of the creation can be known.

This and also such other practices are therefore narrated as of the nature of jyotih (light, since it brings about enlightenment) and tara-jyotih (light as savior – as it saves one from suffering from ignorance).

 

iii. Additionally, hamsa-mantra forms a symbolic mantra in the form of inhalation (ham) and exhalation (sah) of breath.  The ancient text of Satcakra-nirupana says that ‘ham’ symbolizes bindu or Purusha which is the male principle of creation while ‘sah’ is visarga (Prakriti) – the female principle of creation.

Sharadatilaka-XIV.91 says that ‘hamsa’ forms a style of effortless meditation wherein one need not mutter anything.  This is also called as ajapa-vidya or ajapa-gayatri, it stands for the state of ignorance.  When this ‘hamsa’ is reversed, it becomes ‘so’ham’, signifying the highest state of consciousness.  In such a state, an individual gives up being an individual as he realizes ‘I am non-different from Paramatma’.  This is release from ignorance.

 

Conclusion

From being helpful in living worldly life to transcending it for fulfilling the highest state of Consciousness, role of shabda is undoubtedly a crucial one and also all-permeating.  In fact use of shabda decides it all— whether we should suffer or overcome suffering.  Being aware of this, we can make a conscious choice of the kind of shabda that should occupy our mind and intellect and also guide our conscience to the highest blissful state.  Yoga practice is all about this conscious choice, its implementation consciously done and execution carried out with unbridled flow of awareness. 

Be Blissful!!!

 

***

Comments

Popular posts from this blog